🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of states are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and platforms are "taking away our kids' innocence". Legislation could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to prevent their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic statement supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these services, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a good starting point," commented the parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by strong evidence".

Last year, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have voiced concerns. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a young person who was lost after viewing disturbing social media material contends that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely happening at the regional level due to national inaction.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed measures requiring parental consent for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from various individuals to copy the Australian lead, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Outside of the West, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The agency notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries indicate that states internationally are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.